Post by RobReplace Richelieu with a figure who values Catholic solidarity over cutting the Habsburg down to size.
The more realistic (in the terms of what was taking place) option would be to have someone who is interested in the economic well-being of France much more than in its "glory" (in OTL R dealt with the opponents advocating this policy).
However, even this would not take France completely out of the equation as far as her beef with Spain was involved.
Post by RobWhat does this do to the war in Germany.
Absence of the French subsidies, especially those to Sweden. It is an open question if G-A and his military successors could do without these subsidies but
probably they'd "compensate" by more extensive looting wherever possible.
Post by RobAlso, does France have the option of being pro HRe but for a price, like perhaps in return for some concessions in Italy?
The biggest French interests were along its border with the Spanish Netherlands
and Spain was its main opponent. So what you are proposing means a breakdown between Imperial and Spanish Hapsburgs which I find at that point highly unlikely unless you introduce another major change. For example, Wallenstein is not being sacked in 1630 so that the Austrian Hapsburgs manage to keep "their" army and do not require Spanish troops and money.